Value in questioning worldviews
Hey savvy news reader! Thanks for choosing local.
You are now reading
1 of 3 free articles.
Editor,
In the early days of humankind there likely were times when it was helpful (for self, family, tribe) to conquer or kill an opponent. It may have been the approved thing to do – morally justified according to the code of the surviving group. In human social progression, there have been shifts toward acknowledging that cooperation and sharing sometimes are more beneficial than overpowering a competitor – thus, gradual adjustments in moral thinking.
In this long “social-reality-testing” process there have always been differing opinions regarding what was “right” depending upon the unique circumstances of the people involved. This moral relativism has existed all through human development. It is not a modern phenomenon. History overflows with examples of a “self-morally-privileged” culture imposing its will. Under these conditions, people who think differently tend to remain hidden or silent – protecting their daily welfare and survival.
A difference today is that there are technological advances, greater awareness, and freer communication. More is now heard from voices previously subdued. But it is still difficult for the less powerful to proclaim, “Here is what I think is fair and right – and moral.” Such conversation would advance social/ moral justice – humans learning to live cooperatively.
Christianity is only one of thousands of belief systems. Each claims absolute, unquestionable moral superiority. Read Leviticus 25 to ponder moral advice on how to treat your slaves. Note that the rules were made by/for the owners – not the slaves. Morality has always been a reflection of an historical time and place. Modern conditions present new challenges with differing moral and political dilemmas. Example: When does life begin - or end?
Those who imply rigid “religious- moral-privilege” do not like to be challenged. A complaint was made that self-evident truths are being mocked. Replace the word “mocked” with “examined” and the situation is seen more realistically. Yes, religious “self-evident” tenets are being examined. Is there “lifeafter- death” - or not? What is the neuro-psychology of how consciousness and beliefs (faith) form?
It is worth advocating a worldview which promotes questioning, science, evidence, discovery and fruitful lives. Perhaps it is immoral to hinder the search for real truths.
Gene Johnson
Polson
