Conservative principles seem lost with new bills
Hey savvy news reader! Thanks for choosing local.
You are now reading
1 of 3 free articles.
Editor,
In our nation’s long debate about how strong the federal government should be and how much power should rest with state and local governments, Republicans have been fierce for local control.
Why then are we seeing a rash of bills from the Montana State Legislature that violate this basic conservative principle? Here are two examples, although there are many more.
HB 200 would force local governments to engage with federal law enforcement on immigration issues; that is, it prohibits sanctuary cities. Montana, of course, does not have sanctuary cities, but our very busy legislature felt this was a priority. A similar bill was vetoed in the past because it was thought to violate state and U.S. Constitutions and because it created an unfunded mandate to local governments.
More dangerously, HB273 eliminates the public’s say in placing nuclear facilities. It would overturn a people’s initiative and put local communities at risk in a seismically active area.
These are disturbing bills, in any case, but, in opposing them, it seems we should also call the Republican party to task in its many violations of its own principle.
Gail Trenfield
St. Ignatius
