For or against, all have same rights
Hey savvy news reader! Thanks for choosing local.
You are now reading
1 of 3 free articles.
Editor,
Several recent letters from proponents of the CSKT water compact have referred to opponents of the compact as “anti-government.” Perhaps these letter writers would be willing to explain what they mean by the term, but taken at face value it implies “anarchy” or “anarchist.”
Seeking to hold civil government to its constitutional limitations and duties, opposing equally usurpation and abrogation of authority, is not “anti-government.” Before the days of moral relativism, pragmatism, and political expediency, it was called “good citizenship.”
Another recurring theme in letters from proponents of the compact is the importance of giving an ear to “multi-generational” farmers and ranchers as opposed to “newcomers” to the valley or “non-irrigators.”
It is a wonderful thing when farms and ranches — and other businesses and property — are passed down from generation to generation unhindered, helping to preserve the integrity and heritage of families. I strongly support them; including the repeal of one of their biggest obstacles, inheritance taxes. “Inalienable” rights, including property and free speech rights, of these “multi-generational” farmers and ranchers are sacred. The same rights of “newcomers” and “non-irrigators” are no less so.
Rick Jore
Ronan